On the heels of the United States' re-imposition of sanctions on Iran and in the midst of continued uncertainty about Saudi Arabia since the Khashoggi killing,Thomas Friedman for the New York Times points out a counterintuitive similarity between Obama and Trump's Middle East dealings. "In both cases the U.S. hoped that limited bets on Iran and Saudi Arabia moderating their most toxic behaviors might lead to better outcomes," Friedman writes. Betting on Iran's "pro-western middle class," "the Obama team forged the Iran nuclear deal, which curbed Iran's development of nuclear weapons for at least 15 years, in return for a lifting of U.S. sanctions — and with the hoped-for byproduct of opening Iran up to the world." The result? "Iran denuclearized, but the Revolutionary Guards used the release of pressure and fresh cash and investments from the West to further project their power into the Sunni Arab world." Trump has placed a similar bet on Saudi Arabia, Friedman argues: "He tore up the Iran deal, reimposed sanctions on Tehran and vowed to advance U.S. interests in the region by selling $110 billion in arms to Saudi Arabia and betting on the young Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman." The result? "M.B.S. used his carte blanche from America to project power and stretch far beyond his capabilities: intervening in Yemen, blockading Qatar, abducting the prime minister of Lebanon, cracking down on women driving activists and permitting, if not ordering, his team to murder moderate Saudi democracy advocate Jamal Khashoggi." |
No comments:
Post a Comment