This week President Donald Trump claimed that there was "no transparency" in the impeachment inquiry from the House. "Let the facts come out from the charade of people," Trump tweeted, "not selective leaks." CNN Fact Checker Holmes Lybrand digs in for The Point. Q: Are Dems providing "no transparency" over the impeachment inquiry? A: Yes and no. A lot of testimony given so far has been behind closed doors. But there are particular reasons why. Ever since the House began its impeachment inquiry into Trump -- led by the Intelligence Committee -- there have been multiple testimonies given behind closed doors. Normally, committee hearings are required to be open to the public, but in certain circumstances committees can vote on holding the hearing behind closed doors; no media, no public record, all hush hush. According to House rules, a hearing should only be closed if "disclosure" would defame or incriminate someone, endanger national security, compromise law enforcement info or violate a House rule. This, however, doesn't stop those "selective leaks" Trump mentioned from coming out of the closed-door hearings. For instance, certain text messages between Trump officials over Ukraine were leaked to the press, and in order to "correct the record" Democratic chairman of the House Intel, Oversight and Foreign Affairs committee announced that they would provide additional text messages to the public. (Once they review the texts for "personally identifiable information," the chairmen say they will release all of the messages.) So Trump's criticism is not without merit. Some information has been leaked and Democrats are choosing what info to release to the public. But impeachment is a political game, not a legal one, and closed-door hearings are pretty common during impeachment hearings. And both Republicans and Democrats have a long history of leaking information when convenient, and ridiculing leakers when the info is inconvenient. |
No comments:
Post a Comment